United Trackers
General
»
Sound Production
»
acoustic instrumentation
Username:
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Password:
Home
Help
Search
Quick Search
Advanced Search
[Close]
Login
Register
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: acoustic instrumentation (Read 22243 times)
PPH
Newbie
Posts: 38
acoustic instrumentation
«
Reply #15 on:
August 17, 2004, 03:26:01 PM »
Quote from: DMNXS
Quote from: PPH
[..]Renoise is free, except for the "Render to WAV" feature. If you want to have that one, then you have to buy it.[...]
You forgot the missing ASIO support, which really made me stop trying it...
Well, I guess I forgot because it doesn't affect me. I don't use a MIDI controller, I enter the notes one by one with the computer keyboard. Therefore, I couldn't care less about latency
Logged
PPH
DMNXS
Jr. Member
Posts: 69
acoustic instrumentation
«
Reply #16 on:
August 18, 2004, 11:45:47 AM »
Quote from: PPH
Quote from: DMNXS
Quote from: PPH
[..]Renoise is free, except for the "Render to WAV" feature. If you want to have that one, then you have to buy it.[...]
You forgot the missing ASIO support, which really made me stop trying it...
Well, I guess I forgot because it doesn't affect me. I don't use a MIDI controller, I enter the notes one by one with the computer keyboard. Therefore, I couldn't care less about latency
I din't know ASIO had much to do with MIDI, but what I hate is the update time of the visuals (I always wondered why visuals are affected by sound-latency, anyway).
Logged
PPH
Newbie
Posts: 38
acoustic instrumentation
«
Reply #17 on:
August 18, 2004, 02:51:37 PM »
Quote from: DMNXS
Quote from: PPH
Quote from: DMNXS
Quote from: PPH
[..]Renoise is free, except for the "Render to WAV" feature. If you want to have that one, then you have to buy it.[...]
You forgot the missing ASIO support, which really made me stop trying it...
Well, I guess I forgot because it doesn't affect me. I don't use a MIDI controller, I enter the notes one by one with the computer keyboard. Therefore, I couldn't care less about latency
I din't know ASIO had much to do with MIDI, but what I hate is the update time of the visuals (I always wondered why visuals are affected by sound-latency, anyway).
What I mean is: you only need latency if you're playing in real time, because that's when latency matters. If I enter the notes one by one, editing the pattern, I shouldn't care about latency.
Logged
PPH
DMNXS
Jr. Member
Posts: 69
acoustic instrumentation
«
Reply #18 on:
August 21, 2004, 11:57:03 PM »
You're right about that, but I like low latencies during playback for the reason stated above. And I hate the playback delay. There should be some visual correction of the playback cursor to make high delays not so bad.
Logged
PPH
Newbie
Posts: 38
acoustic instrumentation
«
Reply #19 on:
August 24, 2004, 04:02:42 AM »
Quote from: DMNXS
You're right about that, but I like low latencies during playback for the reason stated above. And I hate the playback delay. There should be some visual correction of the playback cursor to make high delays not so bad.
Oh, I get it now. It's not that the latency affects visuals: it's just that sound lateny is bigger than "visual latency".
Logged
PPH
DMNXS
Jr. Member
Posts: 69
acoustic instrumentation
«
Reply #20 on:
August 27, 2004, 02:01:35 PM »
Quote from: PPH
Quote from: DMNXS
You're right about that, but I like low latencies during playback for the reason stated above. And I hate the playback delay. There should be some visual correction of the playback cursor to make high delays not so bad.
Oh, I get it now. It's not that the latency affects visuals: it's just that sound lateny is bigger than "visual latency".
Actually, both
.
Sometimes programs seem to link their visual update frequency to the sound latency. Say you have 100 (or 50) ms, then the program updates visuals with a frequency of 10 (or 20)Hz ... Get my drift
? Cause that's slow... and impossible to work with
...
Logged
PPH
Newbie
Posts: 38
acoustic instrumentation
«
Reply #21 on:
August 28, 2004, 05:11:54 PM »
Quote from: DMNXS
Quote from: PPH
Quote from: DMNXS
You're right about that, but I like low latencies during playback for the reason stated above. And I hate the playback delay. There should be some visual correction of the playback cursor to make high delays not so bad.
Oh, I get it now. It's not that the latency affects visuals: it's just that sound lateny is bigger than "visual latency".
Actually, both
.
Sometimes programs seem to link their visual update frequency to the sound latency. Say you have 100 (or 50) ms, then the program updates visuals with a frequency of 10 (or 20)Hz ... Get my drift
? Cause that's slow... and impossible to work with
...
Yeah, I get it.
Logged
PPH
DNS
Jr. Member
Posts: 65
acoustic instrumentation
«
Reply #22 on:
September 01, 2004, 09:54:25 AM »
hey pph,
hum...renoise sounds tempting, but i wont cross until i donīt see the need.
is renoise machine based and modular?
i have to solve some buzz issues (multiple vsti outs, opening midi files) and iīll dig for a piano roll editor.(any tips anyone?) but if i do - great.
i like the win gui. itīs so bad and ugly - i love it. makes me think "iīm very hardcore, look at me"
it works somehow.
ps - thanks for the acoustic tips. i am using orchestration now periodically - it added nicely to my synth palette. sort of broadened my vocabulary.
peace
Logged
DDspeed
Newbie
Posts: 17
acoustic instrumentation
«
Reply #23 on:
September 01, 2004, 06:14:02 PM »
Quote from: DNS
hey pph,
hum...renoise sounds tempting, but i wont cross until i donīt see the need.
is renoise machine based and modular?
Renoise is fully modular, but not machine-based like Buzz.
Logged
Have You ever been...?
DNS
Jr. Member
Posts: 65
acoustic instrumentation
«
Reply #24 on:
September 02, 2004, 09:15:50 AM »
which makes it a bit poorer soundwise?
what does it use - vstiīs?
Logged
PPH
Newbie
Posts: 38
acoustic instrumentation
«
Reply #25 on:
September 03, 2004, 09:28:31 PM »
Quote from: DNS
which makes it a bit poorer soundwise?
what does it use - vstiīs?
Yes, it uses VSTs. And there are many good VSTs out there. Of course, it's not compatible with Buzz Machines. There is, however, something called BuzzVST, which is a sort of VST version of Buzz. I never got it to work, but it could be an alternative. FruityLoops has an adapter for Buzz Machines too, if I'm not mistaken. And it has a piano roll, that seems to be something you're looking for.
Logged
PPH
PPH
Newbie
Posts: 38
acoustic instrumentation
«
Reply #26 on:
September 03, 2004, 09:36:49 PM »
Something I found. A whole orchestral library. Free.
http://theremin.music.uiowa.edu/MIS.html
Logged
PPH
Anonymous
Full Member
Posts: 142
acoustic instrumentation
«
Reply #27 on:
September 04, 2004, 12:56:58 PM »
oi!
this looks good.
will spare some cpu time if evetr want a orchestral instrument and no more cpu room for vsti.
great diggin.
hope others see this.
thanks
Logged
DNS
Jr. Member
Posts: 65
acoustic instrumentation
«
Reply #28 on:
September 04, 2004, 12:58:14 PM »
posted as guest again
Logged
DNS
Jr. Member
Posts: 65
acoustic instrumentation
«
Reply #29 on:
September 04, 2004, 12:58:50 PM »
posted as guest again
Logged
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Print
United Trackers
»
General
»
Sound Production
» Topic:
acoustic instrumentation
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General
-----------------------------
=> News and Announcements
=> Scene News
=> General Discussion
=> Music
=> Sound Production
=> Software / Hardware
=> Suggestions
=> Off Topic
-----------------------------
Content
-----------------------------
=> Editorials
=> Features
=> FAQ
=> Web Links
Loading...